archive.ssv.asia

Less is a Bore

8 min read

“Less is a Bore”: The Ironic and Eclectic World of Postmodern Architecture

1. Introduction: The Rebellion Against the Glass Box

For nearly half a century, the architectural world was dominated by the austere, rational, and unadorned doctrines of Modernism. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe’s famous dictum, “Less is more,” was the unquestioned mantra, leading to a global landscape of minimalist, “universal” glass boxes. But by the 1960s and 70s, a growing sense of disillusionment had set in. A new generation of architects and critics began to see the utopian dream of Modernism as a sterile and alienating reality. In response to this perceived blandness, a rebellious, witty, and often outrageous new movement emerged: Postmodernism.

In 1966, the architect Robert Venturi, in his “gentle manifesto” Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, offered a direct and defiant retort to Mies: “Less is a bore.” This phrase became the rallying cry for a movement that rejected the rigid purity of Modernism and enthusiastically reintroduced everything it had banished: historical reference, ornament, vibrant color, and a healthy dose of irony. Postmodernism was a loud, pluralistic, and often playful rebellion that argued that architecture should be a form of communication, rich with meaning, symbolism, and even humor. It sought to create buildings that spoke not in a universal, abstract language, but in a rich, eclectic dialect that could connect with the public and the specific culture of a place.

2. The Critique of Modernism: Why the Rebellion?

The rise of Postmodernism was fueled by a deep critique of the perceived failures of the International Style.

  • Placelessness and Homogeneity: The greatest sin of late Modernism, in the eyes of its critics, was its placelessness. The universal “glass box” could be dropped into any city in the world, completely ignoring local climate, materials, culture, and history. Postmodernists argued for a return to an architecture that was contextual and responsive to its specific place.

  • The Lack of Meaning: Modernism’s strict prohibition of ornament and historical allusion had, according to Postmodern thinkers, stripped architecture of its ability to tell stories and communicate meaning. It had become a mute and abstract art form, unable to connect with the public on a symbolic or emotional level.

  • The “Duck” vs. the “Decorated Shed”: The core theoretical argument for Postmodernism was brilliantly articulated in the 1972 book Learning from Las Vegas, by Robert Venturi, Denise Scott Brown, and Steven Izenour. They studied the “ugly and ordinary” architecture of the Las Vegas strip and identified two ways a building communicates meaning:

    • The Duck: This is a building where the form itself is the symbol (named after a roadside duck-shaped stand that sold ducks). Venturi saw heroic, sculptural Modernist buildings as “ducks”—where the entire structure is contorted to express its function.

    • The Decorated Shed: This is a simple, functional building (the “shed”) that relies on applied signs and ornament to convey its meaning. Venturi and his colleagues celebrated the “decorated shed” as a more economical and effective form of architectural communication. This theory provided the intellectual justification for separating a building’s functional form from its symbolic and decorative elements.

3. The Architectural Language of Postmodernism

Postmodernism was not a single, coherent style but a pluralistic and eclectic collection of approaches. However, its practitioners shared a common toolkit of design strategies that were a direct inversion of modernist rules.

  • Historical Reference and Allusion: Architects began to freely and playfully borrow forms and motifs from architectural history. Classical elements like columns, pediments, arches, and keystones made a dramatic comeback, but they were often used in an ironic, oversized, or non-structural way.

  • The Return of Ornament: The modernist ban on ornament was gleefully overturned. Decoration, whether it was a sculptural flourish, a patterned surface, or a symbolic reference, was once again a legitimate part of the architect’s palette.

  • Vibrant and Unconventional Color: The cool, monochromatic palette of Modernism (white, black, and grey) was replaced by a bold and often surprising use of color, including bright hues and soft pastels.

  • Irony, Wit, and Humor: Postmodern buildings often possess a self-aware, theatrical, and even humorous quality. They are filled with visual puns and clever historical jokes, rejecting the solemn, heroic seriousness of their modernist predecessors.

4. Key Figures and Landmark Projects

  • Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown: The intellectual godparents of the movement in the United States.

    • The Vanna Venturi House (1964): Designed by Venturi for his mother, this house in Philadelphia is considered the first major monument of Postmodernism. It is a complex and witty commentary on the very idea of “house.” It has a gabled roof (a traditional symbol) that is split in the middle, an ornamental arch that is purely decorative, and a staircase that famously leads to nowhere. It is a small building packed with “complexity and contradiction.”

  • Michael Graves (1934-2015): Graves became the most recognizable face of corporate Postmodernism in the 1980s.

    • The Portland Building (1982): This municipal services building in Portland, Oregon, was a direct and highly controversial attack on the modernist glass box. It is a colorful, decorated cube, featuring oversized classical garlands, a symbolic “keystone” above its small, punched windows, and a palette of pastel colors.

    • The Swan and Dolphin Hotels at Walt Disney World (1990): These are perhaps the ultimate expression of playful, populist Postmodernism, with their giant, cartoonish swan and dolphin statues, painted wave patterns, and exuberant, entertainment-focused design.

  • Philip Johnson (1906-2005): The ultimate architectural chameleon. Having been the primary champion and codifier of the International Style in America, Johnson dramatically switched allegiance in the late 1970s and became Postmodernism’s most powerful practitioner.

    • The AT&T Building (now 550 Madison Avenue), New York (1984): This project was a watershed moment. It was a massive, 37-story granite skyscraper that was topped not with a flat roof, but with a giant, broken pediment that was famously likened to a piece of Chippendale furniture. Coming from the dean of American modernism, this act of historical quotation was a shocking and definitive signal that the reign of the glass box was over.

  • Charles Moore (1925-1993): Moore’s work was known for its exuberant, colorful, and witty character. His Piazza d’Italia (1978) in New Orleans is a fantastic example. It is a public plaza designed for the city’s Italian-American community, created as a surreal and theatrical collage of classical columns, arches, and a map of Italy, all rendered in bright colors, stainless steel, and neon lights.

5. Criticisms and the Decline of the Style

By the late 1980s, Postmodernism had itself become a dominant style, and a new wave of criticism emerged.

  • Superficiality and Pastiche: The most damaging critique was that the movement was often superficial, simply pasting historical decoration onto conventional buildings without any of the original craft, meaning, or structural logic.

  • Kitsch and Gaudy Aesthetics: Its playful use of color and oversized ornament was often derided by critics as kitschy, cartoonish, and lacking in architectural seriousness.

  • An Elite Irony: While it claimed to be a populist movement that could communicate with the public, its witty and intellectual historical jokes were often only understood by a small architectural elite, leaving the general public to see only a strange and often garish building.

  • The Rise of Deconstructivism: By the late 1980s, a new generation of architects, who would become the Deconstructivists, found Postmodernism’s historical pastiche to be just as restrictive as the modernism it replaced. They sought a more radical and formally inventive path.

6. Conclusion: A Necessary and Liberating Rebellion

Postmodernism as a dominant stylistic movement was relatively short-lived, but its impact was profound and lasting. It was a necessary, if sometimes unruly, rebellion that definitively broke the dogmatic hold of late Modernism. It successfully re-legitimized the importance of history, context, symbolism, and meaning in architectural discourse. It reminded architects that buildings are not just abstract forms; they are powerful forms of communication that should speak to the public and the culture they inhabit. While the specific, often flamboyant, style of 1980s Postmodernism has passed, its core ideas—that architecture should be pluralistic, communicative, and responsive to its place—have been fully absorbed into the mainstream of contemporary architectural thought, continuing to influence the rich and varied built world of today.

References (APA 7th)

  • Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. The Museum of Modern Art.

  • Venturi, R., Scott Brown, D., & Izenour, S. (1977). Learning from Las Vegas. MIT Press.

  • Jencks, C. (1977). The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. Rizzoli.

  • Klotz, H. (1988). The History of Postmodern Architecture. MIT Press.

  • Ghirardo, D. (1996). Architecture After Modernism. Thames & Hudson.

Graph View